Difference between revisions of "Talk:Succubi"
From Felarya
m (Fun but useless triva...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One interesting note: I don't believe "succubi" is actually the "proper" plural name in English: "succubuses" is. (Just like how the plural of "virus" is "viruses", not "viri") However, inspite of the form "succubi" being improper, it's the most commonly used form by far, and I suspect that "succubi" will become a normal irregular English noun, if it hasn't already happened. (Also just like with "virus" and "viri") | One interesting note: I don't believe "succubi" is actually the "proper" plural name in English: "succubuses" is. (Just like how the plural of "virus" is "viruses", not "viri") However, inspite of the form "succubi" being improper, it's the most commonly used form by far, and I suspect that "succubi" will become a normal irregular English noun, if it hasn't already happened. (Also just like with "virus" and "viri") | ||
| − | In summary, although "succubi" is probably technically incorrect, it should stay because nobody uses the proper form. | + | In summary, although "succubi" is probably technically incorrect, it should stay because nobody uses the proper form.--[[User:Oldman40k2003|Oldman40k2003]] 20:01, 8 November 2007 (PST) |
Revision as of 21:01, 8 November 2007
One interesting note: I don't believe "succubi" is actually the "proper" plural name in English: "succubuses" is. (Just like how the plural of "virus" is "viruses", not "viri") However, inspite of the form "succubi" being improper, it's the most commonly used form by far, and I suspect that "succubi" will become a normal irregular English noun, if it hasn't already happened. (Also just like with "virus" and "viri")
In summary, although "succubi" is probably technically incorrect, it should stay because nobody uses the proper form.--Oldman40k2003 20:01, 8 November 2007 (PST)
